SUB-SECTION II.
When we turn to Egypt we find remarkable evidence of the same
thing there also. Justin, as we have already seen, says that "Ninus
subdued all nations, as far as Lybia," and consequently
Egypt. The statement of Diodorus Siculus is to the same effect,
Egypt being one of the countries that, according to him, Ninus
brought into subjection to himself. * In exact accordance with
these historical statements, we find that the name of the third
person in the primeval triad of Egypt was Khons. But Khons, in
Egyptian, comes from a word that signifies "to
chase." * Therefore, the name of Khons, the son of
Maut, the goddess-mother, who was adorned in such a way as to
identify her with Rhea, the great goddess-mother of Chaldea, *
properly signifies "The Huntsman," or god of
the chase. As Khons stands in the very same relation to the
Egyptian Maut as Ninus does to Rhea, how does this title of "The
Huntsman" identify the Egyptian god with Nimrod? Now
this very name Khons, brought into contact with the Roman
mythology, not only explains the meaning of a name in the
Pantheon there, that hitherto has stood greatly in need of
explanation, but causes that name, when explained, to reflect
light back again on this Egyptian divinity, and to strengthen the
conclusion already arrived at. The name to which I refer is the
name of the Latin god Consus, who was in one aspect identified
with Neptune, * but who was also regarded as "the god of
hidden counsels," or "the concealer of
secrets," who was looked up to as the patron of
horsemanship, and was said to have produced the horse. * Who
could be the "god of hidden counsels," or the "concealer
of secrets," but Saturn, the god of the "mysteries,"
and whose name as used at Rome, signified "The hidden
one"? * The father of Khons, or Khonso (as he was also
called), that is, Amoun, was, as we are told by Plutarch, known
as "The hidden God;" * and as father and son
in the same triad have ordinarily a correspondence of character,
this shows that Khons also must have been known in the very same
character of Saturn, "The hidden one." If the
Latin Consus, then, thus exactly agreed with the Egyptian Khons,
as the god of "mysteries," or "hidden
counsels," can there be a doubt that Khons, the
Huntsman, also agreed with the same Roman divinity as the
supposed producer of the horse? Who so likely to get the credit
of producing the horse as the great huntsman of Babel, who no
doubt enlisted it in the toils of the chase, and by this means
must have been signally aided in his conflicts with the wild
beasts of the forest? In this connection, let the reader call to
mind that fabulous creature, the Centaur, half-man, half-horse,
that figures so much in the mythology of Greece. That imaginary
creation, as in generally admitted, was intended to commemorate
the man who first taught the art of horsemanship. * But that
creation was not the offspring of Greek fancy. Here, as in many
other things, the Greeks have only borrowed from an earlier
source. The Centaur is found on coins struck in Babylonia , *
showing that the idea must have originally come from that
quarter. The Centaur is found in the Zodiac , * the antiquity of
which goes up to a high period, and which had its origin in
Babylon. The Centaur was represented, as we are expressly assured
by Berosus, the Babylonian historian, in the temple of Babylon, *
and his language would seem to show that so also it had been in
primeval times. The Greeks did themselves admit this antiquity
and derivation of the Centaur; for though Ixion was commonly
represented as the father of the Centaurs, yet they also
acknowledge that the primitive Centaurus was the same as Kronos,
or Saturn, the father of the gods. * But we have seen that Kronos
was the first King of Babylon, or Nimrod; consequently, the first
Centaur was the same. Now, the way in which the Centaur was
represented on the Babylonian coins, and in the Zodiac, viewed in
this light, is very striking. The Centaur was the same as the
sign Sagittarius, or "The Archer." * If the
founder of Babylon's glory was "The mighty Hunter,"
whose name, even in the days of Moses, was proverb--(Gen. x.
9. "Wherefore, it is said, Even as Nimrod, the mighty hunter
before the Lord")--when we find the "Archer"
with his bow and arrow, in the symbol of the supreme Babylonian
divinity, * and the "Archer," among the signs
of the Zodiac that originated in Babylon, I think we may safely
conclude that this Man-horse or Horse-man Archer primarily
referred to him, and was intended to perpetuate the memory at
once of his fame as a huntsman and his skill as a horse-breaker.
Now, when we thus compare the Egyptian Khons, the "Huntsman,"
with the Latin Consus, the god of gorse-races, who
"produced the horse," and the Centaur of Babylon, to
whom was attributed the honour of being the author of
horsemanship, while we see how all the lines converge in Babylon,
it will be very clear, I think, whence the primitive Egyptian god
Khons has been derived.
Khons, the son of the great goddess-mother, seems to have been
generally represented as a full-grown god. * The Babylonian
divinity was also represented very frequently in Egypt in the
very same way as in the land of his nativity--i.e., as a child in
his mother's arms. * This was the way in which Osiris, "the
son, the husband of his mother," was often exhibited,
and what we learn of this god, equally as in the case of Khonso,
shows that in his original he was none other than Nimrod. It is
admitted that the
secret system of Free Masonry was originally founded on the
Mysteries of the Egyptian Isis, the goddess-mother, or wife of
Osiris. But what could have led to the union of a Masonic body
with these Mysteries, had they not had particular reference to
architecture, and had the god who was worshipped in them not been
celebrated for his success in perfecting the arts of
fortification and building? Now, if such were the case,
considering the relation in which, as we have already seen, Egypt
stood to Babylon, who would naturally be looked up to their as
the great patron of the Masonic art? * The strong presumption is,
that Nimrod must have been the man. He was the first that gained
fame in this way. As the child of the Babylonian goddess-mother,
he was worshipped, as we have seen, in the character of Ala
mahozim, "The god of fortifications," Osiris,
in like manner, the child of the Egyptian Madonna, was equally
celebrated as "the strong chief of the buildings." *
This strong chief of the buildings was originally worshipped in
Egypt with every physical characteristic of Nimrod. I have
already noticed the fact that Nimrod, as the son of Cush, was a
negro. Now, there was a traditional Egypt, recorded by Plutarch,
that "Osiris was black," * which, in a land
where the general complexion was dusky, must have implied
something more than ordinary in its darkness. Plutarch also
states that Horus, the son of Osiris, "was of a fair
complexion," * and it was in this way, for the most
part, that Osiris was represented. But we have unequivocal
evidence that Osiris, the son and husband of the great
goddess-queen of Egypt, was also represented as a veritable
negro. In Wilkinson may be found a representation of him * with
the unmistakable features of the genuine Cushite or negro. Bunsen
would have it that this is a mere random importation from some of
the barbaric tribes; but the dress in which this negro god is
arrayed tells a different tale. That dress directly connects him
with Nimrod. This negro-featured Osiris is clothed from head to
foot in a spotted dress, the upper part being a leopard's skin,
the under part also being spotted to correspond with it. Now the
name Nimrod * signifies "the subduer of the
leopard." This name seems to imply, that as Nimrod had
gained fame by subduing the horse, and so making use of it in the
chase, so his fame as a huntsman rested mainly on this, that he
found out the art of making the leopard aid him in hunting the
other wild beasts. A particular kind of tame leopard is used in
India at this day for hunting; and of Bagajet I., the Mogul
Emperor of India, it is recorded that in his hunting
establishment he had not only hounds of various breeds, but
leopard also, whose "collars were set with jewels."
* Upon the words of the prophet Habakkuk, chap.i.8,
"swifter than leopards," Kitto has the following
remarks:--"The swiftness of the leopard is proverbial in
all countries were it is found. This, conjoined with its other
qualities, suggested the idea in the East of partially training
it, that it might be employed in hunting..... Leopards are now
rarely kept for hunting in Western Asia, unless by kings and
governors; but they are more common in the eastern parts of Asia.
Orosius relates that one was sent by the king of Portugal to the
Pope, which excited great astonishment by the way in which it
overtook, and the facility with which it killed, deer and wild
boars. Le Bruyn mentions a leopard kept by the Pasha who governed
Gaza, and the other territories of the ancient Philistines, and
which he frequently employed in hunting jackals. But it is in
India that the cheetah, or hunting leopard, is most frequently
employed, and is seen in the perfection of his power."
* This custom of taming the leopard, and pressing it into the
service of man in this way, is traced up to the earliest times of
primitive antiquity. In the works of Sir William Jones, we find
it stated from the Persian legends, that Hoshang, the father of
Tahmurs, who built Babylon, was the "first who bred dogs
and leopards for hunting." * As Tahmurs, who built
Babylon, could be none other than Nimrod, this legend only
attributes to his father what, as his name imports, he got the
fame of doing himself. Now, as the classic god bearing the lion's
skin is recognised by that sign as Hercules, the slayer of the
Nemean lion, so in like manner, the god clothed in the leopard's
skin would naturally be marked out as Nimrod, the "leopard-subduer."
That this leopard skin, as appertaining to the Egyptian god, was
no occasional thing, we have clearest evidence. Wilkinson tells
us, that on all high occasions when the Egyptian high priest was
called to officiate, it was indispensable that he should do so
wearing, as his robe of office, the leopard's skin . * As it is a
universal principle in all idolatries that the high priest wears
the insignia of the god he serves, this indicates the importance
which the spotted skin must have had attached to it as a symbol
of the god himself. The ordinary way in which the favourite
Egyptian divinity Osiris was mystically represented was under the
form of a young bull or calf--the calf Apis--from which the
golden calf of the Israelites was borrowed. There was a reason
why that calf should not commonly appear in the appropriate
symbols of the god he represented, for that calf represented the
divinity in the character of Saturn, "The HIDDEN
one," "Apis" being only another name for
Saturn. * The cow of Athor, however, the female divinity
corresponding to Apis, is well known as a "spotted
cow," * and it is singular that the Druids of Britain
also worshipped "a spotted cow." * Rare though
it be, however, to find an instance of the deified calf or young
bull represented with the spots, there is evidence still in
existence, that even it was sometimes so represented. The
accompanying figure represents that divinity, as copied by Col.
Hamilton Smith "from the original collection made by the
artists of the French Institute of Cairo." * When we
find that Osiris, the grand god of Egypt, under different forms,
was thus arrayed in a leopard's skin or spotted dress, and that
the leopard-skin dress was so indispensable a part of the sacred
robes of his high priest, we may be sure that there was a deep
meaning in such a costume. And what could that meaning be, but
just to identify Osiris with the Babylonian god, who was
celebrated as the "Leopard-tamer," and who was
worshipped even as he was, as Ninus, the CHILD in his mother's
arms?