CHAPTER III.
FESTIVALS.
IF Rome be indeed the Babylon of the Apocalypse, and the
Madonna enshrined in her sanctuaries be the very queen of heaven,
for the worshipping of whom the fierce anger of God was provoked
against the Jews in the days of Jeremiah, it is of the last
consequence that the fact should be established beyond all
possibility of doubt; for that being once established, every one
who trembles at the Word of god must shudder at the very thought
of giving such a system, either individually or nationally, the
least countenance or support. Something has been said already
that goes far to prove the identity of the Roman and Babylonian
systems; but at every step the evidence becomes still more
overwhelming. That which arises from comparing the different
festivals is peculiarly so.
The festivals of Rome are innumerable; but five of the most
important may be singled out for elucidation--viz.,
Christmas-day, Lady-day, Easter, the Nativity of St. John, and
the Feast of the Assumption. Each and all of these can be proved
to be Babylonian. And first, as to the festival in honour of the
birth of Christ, or Christmas. How comes it that that festival
was connected with the 25th of December? There is not a word in
the Scriptures about the precise day of His birth, or the time of
the year when He was born. What is recorded there, implies that
at what time soever His birth took place, it could not have been
on the 25th of December. At the time that the angel announced His
birth to the shepherds of Bethlehem, they were feeding their
flocks by night in the open fields. Now, no doubt, the climate of
Palestine is not so severe as the climate of this country; but
even there, though the heat of the day be considerable, the cold
of the night, from December to February, is very piercing, * and
it was not the custom for the shepherds of Judea to watch their
flocks in the open fields later than about the end of October. *
It is in the last degree incredible, then, that the birth of
Christ could have taken place at the end of December. There is
great unanimity among commentators on this point. Besides Barnes,
Doddridge, Lightfoot, Joseph Scaliger, and Jennings, in his "Jewish
Antiquities," who are all of opinion that December 25th
could not be the right time of our Lord's nativity, the
celebrated Joseph Mede pronounces a very decisive opinion to the
same effect. After a long and careful disquisition on the
subject, among other arguments he adduces the following;--"At
the birth of Christ every woman and child was to go to be taxed
at the city whereto they belonged, whither some had long
journeys; but the middle of winter was not fitting for such a
business, especially for women with child, and children to travel
in. Therefore, Christ could not be born in the depth of winter.
Again, at the time of Christ's birth, the shepherds lay abroad
watching with their flocks in the night time; but this was not
likely to be in the middle of winter. And if any shall think the
winter wind was not so extreme in these parts, let him remember
the words of Christ in the gospel, 'Pray that your flight be not
in the winter.' If the winter was so bad a time to flee in, it
seems no fit time for shepherds to lie in the fields in, and
women and children to travel in." * Indeed, it is
admitted by the most learned and candid writers of all parties *
that the day of our Lord's birth cannot be determined, * and that
within the Christian Church no such festival as Christmas was
ever heard of till the third century, and that not till the
fourth century was far advanced did it gain much observance. How,
then, did the Romish Church fix on December the 25th as
Christmas-day? Why, thus: Long before the fourth century, and
long before the Christian era itself, a festival was celebrated
among the heathen, at that precise time of the year, in honour of
the birth of the son of the Babylonian queen of heaven; and it
may fairly be presumed that, in order to conciliate the heathen,
and to swell the number of the nominal adherents of Christianity,
the same festival was adopted by the Roman Church, giving it only
the name of Christ. This tendency on the part of Christians to
meet Paganism half-way was very early developed; and we find
Tertullian, even in his day, about the year 230, bitterly
lamenting the inconsistency of the disciples of Christ in this
respect, and contrasting it with the strict fidelity of the
Pagans to their own superstition. "By us," says
he, "who are strangers to Sabbaths, * and new moons, and
festivals, once acceptable to God, the Saturnalia, the feasts of
January, the Brumalia, and Matronalia, are now frequented; gifts
are carried to and fro, new year's day presents are made with
din, and sports and banquets are celebrated with uproar; oh, how
much more faithful are the heathen to their religion, who take
special care to adopt no solemnity from the Christians." *
Upright men strive to stem the tide, but in spite of all their
efforts, the apostacy went on, till the Church, with the
exception of a small remnant, was submerged under Pagan
superstition. That Christmas was originally a Pagan festival, is
beyond all doubt. The time of the year, and the ceremonies with
which it is still celebrated, prove its origin. In Egypt, the son
of Isis, the Egyptian title for the queen of heaven, was born at
this very time, "about the time of the winter
solstice." * The very name by which Christmas is
popularly known among ourselves--Yule-day * --proves at once its
Pagan and Babylonian origin. "Yule" is the
Chaldee name for an "infant" or "little
child;" * and as the 25th of December was called by our
Pagan Anglo-Saxon ancestors, "Yule-day," or
the "Child's day," and the night that preceded
it, "Mother-night," * long before they came in
contact with Christianity, that sufficiently proves its real
character. Far and wide, in the realms of Paganism, was this
birth-day observed. This festival has been commonly believed to
have had only an astronomical character, referring simply to the
completion of the sun's yearly course, and the commencement of a
new cycle. * But there is indubitably evidence that the festival
in question had a much higher reference than this--that it
commemorated not merely the figurative birth-day of the sun in
the renewal of its course, but the birth-day of the grand
Deliverer. Among the Sabeans of Arabia, who regarded the moon,
and not the sun, as the visible symbol of the favourite object of
their idolatry, the same period was observed as the birth
festival. Thus we read in Stanley's Sabean Philosophy: "On
the 24th of the tenth month," that is December,
according to our reckoning, "the Arabians celebrated the
BIRTHDAY OF THE LORD--that is the Moon." * The Lord
Moon was the great object of Arabian worship, and that Lord Moon,
according to them, was born on the 24th of December, which
clearly shows that the birth which they celebrated had no
necessary connection with the course of the sun. It is worthy of
special note, too, that if Christmas-day among the ancient Saxons
of this island, was observed to celebrate the birth of any Lord
of the host of heaven, the case must have been precisely the same
here as it was in Arabia. The Saxons, as is well known, regarded
the Sun as a female divinity, and the Moon as a male. * It must
have been the birth-day of the Lord Moon, therefore, and not of
the Sun, that was celebrated by them on the 25th of December,
even as the birth-day of the same Lord Moon was observed by the
Arabians on the 24th of December. The name of the Lord Moon in
the East seems to have been Meni, for this appears the most
natural interpretation of the Divine statement in Isaiah lxv. 11,
"But ye are they that forsake my holy mountain, that
prepare a temple for Gad, and that furnish the drink-offering
unto Meni." * There is reason to believe that Gad
refers to the sun-god, and that Meni in like manner designates
the moon-divinity. * Meni, or Manai, signifies "The
Numberer." and it is by the changes of the moon that
the months are numbered: Psalm civ. 19, "He appointed
the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth the time of its going
down." The name of the "Man of the Moon,"
or the god who presided over that luminary among the Saxons,
was Mane, as given in the "Edda," * and Mani,
in the "Voluspa." * That it was the birth of
the "Lord Moon" that was celebrated among our
ancestors at Christmas, we have remarkable evidence in the name
that is still given in the lowlands of Scotland to the feast on
the last day of the year, which seems to be a remnant of the old
birth festival for the cakes then made are called Nur-Cakes, or
Birth-cakes. That name is Hogmanay. * Now,
"Hog-Manai" in Chaldee signifies "The
feast of the Numberer;" in other words, The festival of
Deus Lunus, or of the Man of the Moon. To show the connection
between country and country, and the inveterate endurance of old
customs, it is worthy of remark, that Jerome, commenting on the
very words of Isaiah already quoted, about spreading "a
table for Gad," and "pouring out a
drink-offering to Meni," observes that it "was
the custom so late as his time [in the fourth century], in all
cities especially in Egypt and at Alexandria, to set tables, and
furnish them with various luxurious articles of food, and with
goblets containing a mixture of new wine, on the last day of the
month and the year, and that the people drew omens from them in
respect of the fruitfulness of the year." * The
Egyptian year began at a different time from ours; but this is a
near as possible (only substituting whisky for wine), the way in
which Hogmanay is still observed on the last day of the last
month of our year in Scotland. I do not know that any omens are
drawn from anything that takes place at that time, but everybody
in the south of Scotland is personally cognisant of the fact,
that, on Hogmanay, or the evening before New Year's day, among
those who observe old customs, a table is spread, and that while
buns and other dainties are provided by those who can afford
them, oat cakes and cheese are brought forth among those who
never see oat cakes but on this occasion, and that strong drink
forms an essential article of the provision.
Even where the sun was the favourite object of worship, as in
Babylon itself and elsewhere, at this festival he was worshipped
not merely as the orb of day, but as God incarnate. * It was an
essential principle of the Babylonian system, that the Sun or
Baal was the one only God. * When, therefore, Tammuz was
worshipped as God incarnate, that implied also that he was an
incarnation of the Sun. In the Hindoo Mythology, which is
admitted to be essentially Babylonian, this comes out very
distinctly. There, Surya, or the sun, is represented as being
incarnate, and born for the purpose of subduing the enemies of
the gods, who, without such a birth, could not have been subdued.
*
It was no mere astronomic festival, then, that the Pagans
celebrated at the winter solstice. That festival at Rome was
called the feast of Saturn, and the mode in which it was
celebrated there, showed whence it had been derived. The feast,
as regulated by Caligula, lasted five days; * loose reins were
given to drunkenness and revelry, slaves had a temporary
emancipation, * and used all manner of freedoms with their
masters. * This was precisely the way in which, according to
Berosus, the drunken festival of the month Thebeth, answering to
our December, in other words. the festival of Bacchus, was
celebrated in Babylon. "It was the custom," says
he, "during the five days it lasted, for masters to be
in subjection to their servants, and one of them ruled the house,
clothed in a purple garment like a king." * This "purple-robed"
servant was called "Zoganes," * the "Man
of sport and wantonness," and answered exactly to the
"Lord of Misrule," that in the dark ages, was
chosen in all Popish countries to head the revels of Christmas.
The wassailling bowl of Christmas had its precise counterpart in
the "Drunken festival" of Babylon; and many of
the other observances still kept up among ourselves at Christmas
came from the very same quarter. The candles, in some parts of
England, lighted on Christmas-eve, and used so long as the
festive season lasts, were equally lighted by the Pagans on the
eve of the festival of the Babylonian god, to do honour to him:
for it was one of the distinguishing peculiarities of his worship
to have lighted wax-candles on his altars. * The Christmas tree,
now so common among us, was equally common in Pagan Rome and
Pagan Egypt. In Egypt that tree was the palm-tree; in Rome it was
the fir; * the palm-tree denoting the Pagan Messiah, as
Baal-Tamar, the fir referring to him as Baal-Berith. The mother
of Adonis, the Sun-God and great mediatorial divinity, was
mystically said to have been changed into a tree, and when in
that state to have brought forth her divine son. * If the mother
was a tree, the son must have been recognised as the
"Man the branch." And this entirely accounts for
the putting of the Yule Log into the fire on Christmas-eve, and
the appearance of the Christmas-tree the next morning. As
Zero-Ashta, "The seed of the woman," which
name also signified Ignigena, or "born of the
fire," he has to enter the fire on "Mother-night,"
that he may be born the next day out of it, as the "Branch
of God," or the Tree that brings all divine gifts to
men. But why, it may be asked, does he enter the fire under the
symbol of a Log? To understand this, it must be remembered that
the divine child born at the winter solstice was born as a new
incarnation of the great god (after that god had been cut in
pieces), on purpose to revenge his death upon his murderers. *
Now the great god, cut off in the midst of his power and glory,
was symbolised as a huge tree, stripped of all its branches, and
cut down almost to the ground. * But the great serpent, the
symbol of the life restoring * AEsculapius, twists itself around
the dead stock , * and lo, at its side up sprouts a young tree--a
tree of an entirely different kind, that is destined never to be
cut down by hostile power--even the palm-tree, the well-known
symbol of victory. The Christmas-tree, as has been stated, was
generally at Rome a different tree, even the fir; but the very
same idea as was implied in the palm-tree was implied in the
Christmas-fir; for that covertly symbolised the new-born God as
Baal-berith, * "Lord of the Covenant," and
thus shadowed forth the perpetuity and everlasting nature of his
power, not that after having fallen before his enemies, he had
risen triumphant over them all. Therefore, the 25th of December,
the day that was observed at Rome as the day when the victorious
god reappeared on earth, was held at the Natalis invicti solis, "The
birth-day of the unconquered Sun." * Now the Yule Log
is the dead stock of Nimrod, deified as the sun-god, but cut down
by his enemies; the Christmas-tree is Nimrod redivivus--the slain
god come to life again. In the light reflected by the above
statement on customs that still linger among us, the origin of
which has been lost in the midst of hoar antiquity, let the
reader look at the singular practice still kept up in the South
on Christmas-eve, of kissing under the misletoe bough. That
misletoe bough in the Druidic superstition, which, as we have
seen, was derived from Babylon, was a representation of the
Messiah, "The man the branch." The misletoe
was regarded as a divine branch * --a branch that came from
heaven, and grew upon a tree that sprung out of the earth. Thus
by the engrafting of the celestial branch into the earthly tree,
heaven and earth, that sin had severed, were joined together, and
thus the misletoe bough became the token of Divine reconciliation
to man, the kiss being the will-known token of pardon and
reconciliation. Whence could such an idea have come? May it not
have come from the eighty-fifth Psalm, ver. 10,11,
"Mercy and truth are met together; righteousness and peace
have KISSED each other. Truth shall spring out of the earth [in
consequence of the coming of the promised Saviour], and
righteousness shall look down from heaven"? Certain it
is that that Psalm was written soon after the Babylonish
captivity; and as multitudes of the Jews, after that event, still
remained in Babylon under the guidance of inspired men, such as
Daniel, as a part of the Divine word it must have been
communicated to them, as well as to their kinsmen in Palestine.
Babylon was, at that time, the centre of the civilised world; and
thus Paganism, corrupting the Divine symbol as it ever has done,
had opportunities of sending forth its debased counterfeit of the
truth to all the ends of the earth, through the Mysteries that
were affiliated with the great central system in Babylon. Thus
the very customs of Christmas still existent cast surprising
light at once on the revelations of grace made to all the earth,
and the efforts made by Satan and his emissaries to materialise,
carnalise, and degrade them.
In many countries the boar was sacrificed to the god, for the
injury a boar was fabled to have done him. According to one
version of the story of the death of Adonis, or Tammuz, it was,
as we have seen, in consequence of a wound from the tusk of a
boar that he died. * The Phrygian Attes, the beloved of Cybele,
whose story was identified with that of Adonis, was fabled to
have perished in like manner, by the tusk of a boar. * Therefore,
Diana, who though commonly represented in popular myths only as
the huntress Diana, was in reality the great mother of the gods,
* has frequently the boar's head as her accompaniment, in token
not of any mere success in the chase, but of her triumph over the
grand enemy of the idolatrous system, in which she occupied so
conspicuous a place. According to Theocritus, Venus was
reconciled to the boar that killed Adonis, because when brought
in chains before her, it pleaded so pathetically that it had not
killed her husband of malice prepense, but only through accident.
* But yet, in memory of the deed that the mystic boar had done,
many a boar lost its head or was offered in sacrifice to the
offended goddess. In Smith, Diana is represented with a boar's
head lying beside her, on the top of a heap of stones, * and in
the accompanying woodcut , * in which the Roman Emperor Trajan is
represented burning incense to the same goddess, the boar's head
forms a very prominent figure. On Christmas-day the Continental
Saxons offered a boar in sacrifice to the Sun, * to propitiate
her * for the loss of her beloved Adonis. In Rome a similar
observance had evidently existed; for a boar formed the great
article at the feast of Saturn, as appears from the following
words of Martial:--
"That boar will make you a good Saturnalia." *
Hence the boar's head is still a standing dish in England at
the Christmas dinner, when the reason of it is long since
forgotten. Yea, the "Christmas goose" and "Yule
cakes" were essential articles in the worship of the
Babylonian Messiah, as that worship was practised both in Egypt
and at Rome . Wilkinson, in reference to Egypt, shows that "the
favourite offering" of Osiris was "a
goose," * and moreover, that the "goose could
not be eaten except in the depth of winter." * As to
Rome, Juvenal says, "that Osiris, if offended, could be
pacified only by a large goose * and a thin cake." * In
many countries we have evidence of a sacred character attached to
the goose. It is well known that the capitol of Rome was on one
occasion saved when on the point of being surprised by the Gauls
in the dead of night, by the cackling of the geese sacred to
Juno, kept in the temple of Jupiter. * The accompanying woodcut *
proves that the goose in Asia Minor was the symbol of Cupid, just
as it was the symbol of Seb in Egypt. In India, the goose
occupied a similar position; for in that land we read of the
sacred "Brahmany goose," or goose sacred to
Brahma. * Finally, the monuments of Babylon show * that the goose
possessed a like mystic character in Chaldea, and that it was
offered in sacrifice there, as well as in Rome or Egypt, for
there the priest is seen with the goose in the one hand, and his
sacrificing knife in the other. * There can be no doubt, then,
that the Pagan festival at the winter solstice - in other words,
Christmas - was held in honour of the birth of the Babylonian
Messiah.
The consideration of the next great festival in the Popish
calendar gives the very strongest confirmation to what has now
been said. That festival, called Lady-day, is celebrated at Rome
on the 25th of March, in alleged commemoration of the miraculous
conception of our Lord in the womb of the Virgin, on the day when
the angel was sent to announce to her the distinguished honour
that was to be bestowed upon her as the mother of the Messiah.
But who could tell when this annunciation was made? The Scripture
gives no clue at all in regard to the time. But it mattered not.
But our Lord was either conceived or born, that very day now set
down in the Popish calendar for the "Annunciation of the
Virgin" was observed in Pagan Rome in honour of Cybele,
the Mother of the Babylonian Messiah. * Now, it is manifest that
Lady-day and Christmas-day stand in intimate relation to one
another. Between the 25th of March and the 25th of December there
are exactly nine months. If, then, the false Messiah was
conceived in March and born in December, can any one for a moment
believe that the conception and birth of the true Messiah can
have so exactly synchronised, not only to the mouth, but to the
day? The thing is incredible. Lady-day and Christmas-day, then,
are purely Babylonian.